No Pretty Picture Today

Normally on a Saturday, I’d have a pretty picture of a nebula, or a galaxy, or a star cluster to show you. But there hasn’t been a clear sky all week, so I have nothing new to post. On the plus side, my rain barrels, that had run dry for the first time in 18 years, are now full and ready to water the plants again.

I have been looking to do a bit more than take pretty pictures though, and have been tentatively embarking on a couple of astronomical projects. The first one is my first look at variable stars. This is one area where amateur astronomers can make a real contribution to science. There are lots of reasons why some stars vary in brightness. Some are intrinsically variable because of their composition. Others are binary objects where the main star gets eclipsed. Others undergo periodic explosions, like T Cor Bor, that I’ve been observing for well over a year now.

The world’s big telescopes are too precious a resource to spend their time monitoring all the variable stars in the sky. This is where amateurs come in. The American Association of Variable Star Observers allows amateurs to collect and upload their observations of variable stars. Providing a long term database of millions of observations.

https://www.aavso.org/

Naturally, all these observations must be standardised and of the same high quality. I’m still a beginner at this. The technical lingo that surrounds the subject is all a bit baffling to me at the moment. However, I’m hoping that my smart scope will come in handy here.

Seestar S50 All-in-One Smart Telescope

This magic box, about the same size and weight as a bag of sugar, contains a high quality lens, a camera, a computerised mount, various filters, a built in computer, and a phone based app that you can operate from any internet connection. Before this I used to spend about half an hour just trying to find T Cor Bor. Now, I can go to it instantly. As well as producing nice pictures, it records the time, date, geographical location and celestial coordinates of the object being photographed. They should be ideal for variable star observation. There are even people who who set it up and tell it to take automated pictures every ten minutes of things like T Cor Bor, so that professional astronomers can be informed as soon as it goes bang.

As well as T Cor Bor, I’ve had my first glimpse of SS Cyg. My pic on the right, a couple from AAVSO on the left.

This is a cataclysmic variable, like T Cor Bor. A red dwarf star is feeding a nearby white dwarf. And they really are nearby, separated by less than half the distance between the earth and the moon. But whereas T Cor Bor goes off every 80 years, SS Cyg goes off every couple of months. They would be an absolutely spectacular sight to see close up. Although you wouldn’t want to be anywhere nearby when it ignites.

The Seestar S50 brings me on to the the other project that I’ve been exploring this week. While the S50 is an amazing box, it’s not perfect. It only has a two inch objective lens. My “big” telescope has a six inch lens, with nearly ten times the light collecting power.

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/telescopes-in-stock/sky-watcher-heritage-150p-flextube-virtuoso-gti.html

The S50 works so well because it is a tightly integrated system. But this is also a disadvantage. It’s completely enclosed, with no options to change focal length, camera or mount. If you want to try something different then you have to discard the whole box and start with a completely new setup. There are better alternatives, but just look at the price.

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/telescopes-in-stock/celestron-origin-intelligent-home-observatory.html

So I’ve been exploring the possibility of adding the same automation capabilities to my existing SkyWatcher six inch scope. I think it can be done. A lot of the software that powers these smart scopes is based on existing open source software. I’ve been looking at one of the options available on Linux, a package called KStars.

https://kstars.kde.org/

This might look like just another planetarium package, but it’s so much more. It has the built in ability to control almost anything that’s astronomy related: telescopes, cameras, filter wheels, focusers, camera rotaters, domes. It can control them locally, or remotely. The catch is, in order to be able to control every manufacturer’s equipment, it has to be very flexible. And in order to be flexible, that makes it complicated. It’s one of those bits of software where you open a dialog and there are ten tabs. Each tab has dozens of controls with obscure sounding names or initials. And I don’t know what most of them mean.

So far I’ve got it to talk to the telescope and point it where I want it to go. I’ve got it to talk to a cheap astronomical camera that I bought. Although it’s not quite taking pictures they way I’d like. If I get this working properly then I should be able to get the big scope to do what the smart scope does. The way it works is this.

The smart scope uses a mixture of GPS and a built in compass to point to roughly the right part of the sky that you want to image. It then takes a picture. It compares the picture to its database of stars and figures out where the scope is really pointing and then moves the scope in the direction needed to get closer to the target. It repeats this over and over until the target is dead center. The technique is called “plate solving”.

When everything is setup correctly, KStars should be able to do this for my big scope. And that should make my life a whole lot easier for finding targets and performing long exposures.

I should be able to get higher resolution images, using my existing gear and at almost no cost. What’s more, I won’t be tied to any particular system or manufacturer. If I want to upgrade the camera, or mount, or telescope, or if I want to add a separate guide scope or focuser, or filter wheel, I can do it one piece of equipment at a time. But it looks like it’s going to require a bit of perseverance and patience. Watch this space…

Which Moon Pic do you Prefer?

Here are two very similar pictures of the moon. One taken with my 6 inch Skywatcher reflector and a Lumix GF7 camera. The other taken with the Seestar S50 2 inch refractor.

Do you have a preference? It might not be easy to decide as I’ve tried to make their size, orientation, contrast and colour as similar as possible. Here’s a higher resolution version. (I recommend that the high res pics are viewed on something a bit bigger than a phone.)

https://mega.nz/file/Q5J0xZpJ#R3Cr1oE-uMUuLBEs7Z8XLaDz6fhTS8WcgRQT1k5Sfk0

I’ll come back to this later. To maintain the air of mystery and suspense, I won’t say yet which picture came from which telescope.

I was hoping to show some splendid pictures of the total lunar eclipse from Friday morning. It was a beautiful clear sky all night with the forecast to remain fine. The moon was full and looked absolutely glorious, all ready to move into the Earth’s shadow. I had both telescopes set up and ready to go (even though my back pain was giving me hell). The S50 was going to do time lapse movies, while the Skywatcher would record high resolution pics. Then, with ten minutes to go, this happened…

And here’s a short movie of the clouds doing their thing, getting in the way.

https://mega.nz/file/d94gEYAR#avI8f17wZWyNmsQcY_yk6zEAGqWwSyGBJx7U-8aRu_Q

I waited for about half an hour, hoping that the cloud was just temporary, but it just got thicker and thicker, until the moon was completely obscured. So I put all the equipment away and came back inside. Just after dawn, when the moon had set, the sky cleared again. If I was so inclined, I might suspect that someone was trying to tell me something.

Here are some pics from those who were more fortunate.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr42k4qpr7go

Still, we had some lovely clear nights over the last week or so. I managed to enlarge my set of waxing moon phases. Adding in some from January, it now looks fairly complete.

On the night of the thinnest crescent moon, I also took an overexposed shot to reveal the part of the moon in shadow.

And on the night of March the 7th to 8th I took one of those comparison photos that shows the terminator moving overnight.

https://mega.nz/file/14Y0yZoZ#TN-ONWQ_APudub341L5jjr5Hnk73Yut0EyRSNqvYV8E

The waxing moon is the easy bit though. It appears from early evening and usually means going out either just before, or just after, tea. The waning moon is very different. It’s OK getting the initial stages, but the later crescents mean being out early in the morning close to dawn. Let’s see how dedicated I can be.

Now back to the telescope comparison at the top. Personally, I can’t tell a lot of difference between the two when viewed on a web page. However, when you zoom in, the difference becomes more obvious.

https://mega.nz/file/4lwjVDZS#s_2lEd2iIk4RbKo7wOeVH0gzIPrjMsW9db28WiYD1uA

In both cases, the right hand picture comes from the larger, six inch, scope. The close up illustrates the much higher resolution that the larger scope is capable of. This is what I’ve found using the smaller smart telescope over the last couple of months. It’s absolutely fantastic for just putting outside and telling it to go take a picture of something. Incredibly easy. It produces amazing results for publishing on the web. But take a closer look and its pictures are all a bit fuzzy. It wets the appetite, making you want to try to do something better.

The larger scope can produce much more detailed pictures, but it isn’t “smart”. It takes a lot of fiddling about to keep it on target and to keep taking images.

Oddly enough, the manufacturer of the smart scope also supplies a lot of higher resolution, and much more expensive, equipment. If this is a clever marketing strategy then I have to say it’s working. I’m looking at their more expensive gear. This little box of tricks, for example, can turn almost any scope into a smart scope.

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/zwo-cameras/zwo-asi2600mc-air-wireless-smart-camera.html

But just look at the price! I think I might have to save up my pocket money for that one.

And finally, this morning’s nearly full moon.

https://mega.nz/file/Z1oEAQya#CVKKdHK0V3Gy9I7Y2iSYfFg1eLB6xRdpuc5g1755iv8

A Cluster of Clusters

Look south just after sunset today and you’ll see the unmistakable constellation of Orion.

Follow Orion’s belt left and down and you find Sirius, the brightest star in the sky. Sirius is so bright for two reasons. First, it really is a bright star, shining some 25 times brighter than the sun. Second, Sirius is on our cosmic doorstep. At a mere 8 light years away it’s one our next door neighbours in space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius

Sirius is surrounded in our view of the sky by a bunch of light smudges. These are open clusters of stars. A closeup map from Stellarium shows a few of the brighter ones. Many of these are visible with binoculars.

And here are a few of the brightest ones: M46, M47 and M50.

I particularly like M46 because it includes a bright orange foreground star, 140 Pup, a red giant 700 light years away. This contrasts with the main cluster which is nearly 5,000 light years away.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_46

Open star clusters tend to show mainly young, bluish stars. They’re usually regions of recent star formation where the constituents haven’t yet dispersed. We mostly see the brightest members which tend to be blue-white in colour. Their dimmer, yellow-red companions are outshone by these blue-white stars.

M46 has another surprise though. It also includes a planetary nebula, shown near the top left of this photo. It goes by the charming name of NGC 2438.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_2438

Again, this is a foreground object about 1,300 light years away. It’s not a true member of the cluster. Planetary nebulae have nothing to do with planets. They just look a bit like planets. They’re the remnants of old stars that have blown off their outer atmosphere and are now illuminated by the remaining core at their center. Given that this is an older star, it should now be obvious that it can’t truly be part of the open cluster M46.

On the opposite side of the sky, I’m still stacking photos of M13, the Great Globular Cluster in Hercules. This is three night’s worth of photos stacked. I’m not sure if adding any more to this will improve the quality or not. Only one way to find out…

All photos taken with my Seestar S50.

A Multiplicity of Moon Images

It’s been a splendid couple of weeks for moon pics. And unusually for my part of the world, there’s even be a few clear skies.

I’ll start off with the phases of the moon, beginning with first quarter on 6 Jan, all the way through to the full moon on 13 Jan. There were still a couple of cloudy nights, so it isn’t a complete record. I also haven’t got the scale and illumination quite right, so don’t pay too much attention to that. The first two photos on the top left are from consecutive nights and give a good, clear indication of how much the phase changes in a single day. These were all taken with my main 6″ telescope and the Panasonic Lumix GF7 camera.

The moon’s been doing a regular tour of the night sky, starting on 4th Jan by visiting Venus. Sadly, I didn’t get a picture of this one, so you’ll have to rely on the BBC for that.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3rqe2ndl0lo

On the 9 Jan it was the turn of the Pleiades star cluster, better known as the Seven Sisters, to receive a visit from the moon.

The photo above is really a composite of two photos taken a few seconds apart with very different exposures. The moon is much, much brighter than the brightest stars. A single image tends to either grossly over expose the moon, or make the stars invisible. Here’s what a single exposure from a few minutes later looked like.

Both the above images taken with the GF7 and a Carl Zeiss 135mm lens.

Next up on the grand tour was Jupiter. Once again, I needed to combine two separate images. Even Jupiter is no match for the brightness of the moon.

The inset on this image is a crop of Jupiter from the same photo, showing a close up of some of the Galilean moons. GF7 + Carl Zeiss again.

Finally, on the morning of 14 Jan, there was a lunar occultation of Mars, where the planet passed behind the moon. This wasn’t fully visible in the UK. Here, the moon just edged closer and closer to Mars, but never actually obscured it. For an excellent description of why occultations are important, especially when it’s a full moon, see this post by Matt Strassler.

I was in my back garden until about 3.30 am. The closest approach wasn’t until about 4.30, but I was just getting too cold and too tired to wait up longer. So this was one of the final pictures that I took.

Taken with my 6″ scope and the GF7. It’s been cropped and I’ve slightly increased the brightness and colour saturation of Mars, but otherwise it’s a single image from the camera. I was reasonably chuffed with this. Then I saw this totally amazing image on Astronomy Picture of the Day.

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250115.html

Oh well, keep practising!

First Light With my New Scope

Over the last couple of years I’ve been struggling to do a little astrophotography on the cheap. I’ve used an entry level Newtonian with a second hand mirrorless camera, neither of which were designed for the purpose. However, the limitations of the equipment were beginning to show. Attempts to photograph the Virgo galaxy cluster and the Horsehead nebula proved fruitless. The scope and camera had to be controlled independently, so I had to sit beside them outside and monitor everything they do, manually taking individual pictures with no real idea how they would turn out.

So I bought myself one of these, a Seestar S50, one of the new generation of “smart” telescopes.

https://www.365astronomy.com/zwo-seestar-s50-all-in-one-smart-apo-refractor-telescope

It’s a bit more money than I’m used to spending on this hobby, but if my first night out with it is anything to judge by then I think it’ll be worth it. And in comparison to some, it’s relatively cheap.

https://www.365astronomy.com/celestron-origin-intelligent-home-observatory-6-rasa-smart-telescope

It’s about two feet tall, including the tripod, and weighs roughly the same as a bag of sugar. So you can pick it up with one hand and take it anywhere. It contains a highly quality lens system, a low noise camera sensor, a dew heater to prevent it misting up, a dual narrow-band light pollution filter, a solar filter, an auto-focuser, tracking software and image stacking software. Everything is controlled from a single phone app that, fortunately for me, is almost idiot proof.

I used to spend a considerable part of each night just trying to get things in focus. Sometimes I’d have to repeat each session multiple times just to be sure of getting the focus spot on. The Seestar app has an auto-focus button. I just press that and, as if by magic, within a few seconds everything is in perfect focus.

It seems to have quickly become a tradition that the first thing everybody does with the Seestar S50 is photograph either Andromeda or the Orion Nebula, and I’m no exception. so let’s get them out of the way.

andrOrion2

These are pretty much how they came out of the box. I’ve brightened them a bit, probably too much in the case of Andromeda, but otherwise haven’t done any post processing on them. The Seestar also let’s you save the individual image files so that you can do your own selection and stacking rather than rely on its algorithms. I haven’t got around to that yet. The one night I’ve spent with it gave me more data than I previously got in a month. It’ll take me weeks to work my way through it all.

Just to prove that it really could take the pictures that I couldn’t take before. Here’s part of the Virgo cluster of galaxies and the famous horsehead nebula. Again, I’ve cropped and brightened the images very quickly, with no real attention to detail.

The big white blob at the top of the horsehead picture is the star Alnitak, the left hand star in Orion’s belt.

One of the downsides of the Seestar is also illustrated in the horsehead picture. If you look carefully at the right hand side of that image, you’ll see vertical streaks running at an increasing angle down the right hand side. This is because of the type of mount that it uses. It can go up and down and left to right. This allows it to track the positions of objects in the sky. However, if you think about it, objects don’t just appear to move across the sky, they also appear to rotate. The Seestar can’t fully compensate for this, with the result that longer exposures cause the effect you see. There’s a well known way around this, but as this was my first night out I wasn’t going to try anything elaborate.

A couple of more galaxies, Bode’s galaxies and the Triangulum galaxy.

There are a couple of lines across the bottom of the left hand image of Bode’s galaxies. This isn’t a telescope artefact this time, but a plane flying across one of the frames. When I do my own stacking I’ll get rid of this frame.

And now a couple of old favourites, the Double Cluster in Perseus and T Corona Borealis – our unexploded star. The Double Cluster picture is way better than anything I’ve previously taken with my old setup. Despite being one of the largest and brightest objects in the sky, my old telescope often had difficulty finding the Double Cluster. The Seestar uses a technique called “plate solving”. Essentially it compares what it sees with its internal database of stars, figures out where it’s pointing, and moves to the desired location. All with no user intervention whatever.

T Cor Bor has disappeared from the evening sky in the west, but if you wait until about 4 am it rises above the eastern horizon again.

And finally, that sun-with-a-bird picture. This time I’ve included another sun-with-a-bird picture from the next day. When you’re imaging the sun, especially when you take movies over a couple of minutes, it’s actually surprisingly common to see a plane or a flock of birds transit the sun’s disk. Notice how the sunspots move with the sun’s rotation from one day to the next.

My other scope has about ten times the light gathering power of the Seestar, so it isn’t redundant. And it’s got one thing that the Seestar doesn’t have, an eyepiece, so you can actually look at the sky with your eyes rather than a phone. But for sheer convenience and it’s ability to record images, the new box is quite unbelievable. I might even try driving a few miles out of town to escape some of the light pollution in my back yard.

But I’ve saved the best bit for last. As it’s controlled by a single, dedicated, phone app, and you can operate it over wi-fi, I can sit in the comfort of my living room in shorts and t-shirt, glass of wine in hand, and tell the telescope exactly what I want it to do. Then I just sit back and watch as the images appear on my screen. No more shivering for hours outside in the cold. In fact, the telescope barely needs me at all.